Chapter IV - Of the Performance of Contracts
Section 43
Section 43: Joint promises and contribution
Section 43 distinguishes the creditor's ability to seek the whole joint performance from contribution between joint promisors. A promisor's internal share does not automatically limit what the promisee can demand under the central default rule.
On this page
Need advice on Section 43?
This article is for general information. Refer to the Indian Contract Act, 1872 official text for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.
Statutory text
Bare law
When two or more persons make a joint promise, the promisee may, in the absence of express agreement to the contrary, compel any one or more of such joint promisors to perform the whole of the promise.
Each promisor may compel contribution.—Each of two or more joint promisors may compel every other joint promisor to contribute equally with himself to the performance of the promise, unless a contrary intention appears from the contract.
Sharing of loss by default in contribution.—If any one of two or more joint promisors makes default in such contribution, the remaining joint promisors must bear the loss arising from such default in equal shares.
Explanation.—Nothing in this section shall prevent a surety from recovering from his principal, payments made by the surety on behalf of the principal, or entitle the principal to recover anything from the surety on account of payments made by the principal.
Illustrations
(a) A, B and C jointly promise to pay D 3,000 rupees. D may compel either A or B or C to pay him 3,000 rupees.
(b) A, B and C jointly promise to pay D the sum of 3,000 rupees. C is compelled to pay the whole. A is insolvent, but his assets are sufficient to pay one-half of his debts. C is entitled to receive 500 rupees from A’s estate, and 1,250 rupees from B.
(c) A, B and C are under a joint promise to pay D 3,000 rupees. C is unable to pay anything, and A is compelled to pay the whole. A is entitled to receive 1,500 rupees from B.
(d) A, B and C are under a joint promise to pay D 3,000 rupees, A and B being only sureties for C. C fails to pay. A and B are compelled to pay the whole sum. They are entitled to recover it from C.
Rule and business relevance
Absent express agreement to the contrary, any one or more joint promisors can be compelled to perform the whole promise. Contribution is equal unless the contract shows a contrary intention; contribution default losses are shared equally among the remaining promisors. The explanation preserves the principal-surety distinction.
Limits and related provisions
Do not apply equal internal contribution without reading the agreement or treating a surety as an ordinary principal debtor. The provision also does not authorise multiple recoveries of the same debt. Evidence of payment and inter-party roles matters.
Hypothetical business example
Hypothetical: three joint debtors owe one amount and the creditor obtains full payment from one. That debtor then assesses contribution from the others, distinguishing this internal claim from the creditor's original enforcement right.
Practical decision flow
Identify all joint promisors, their roles and any contrary express enforcement agreement.
Record the performance made and compute contribution under the contract or statutory default.
Account for a contributor's default and preserve any distinct surety rights against the principal.
Check the applicable legal framework
This guide explains the central provision. Applicable State amendments, the agreement, transaction date and other governing laws can affect its application. Check the current legal framework before relying on it for a commercial decision.
Practical checklist
Do
- Identify all joint promisors, their roles and any contrary express enforcement agreement.
- Record the performance made and compute contribution under the contract or statutory default.
- Account for a contributor's default and preserve any distinct surety rights against the principal.
Avoid
- Do not apply equal internal contribution without reading the agreement or treating a surety as an ordinary principal debtor. The provision also does not authorise multiple recoveries of the same debt. Evidence of payment and inter-party roles matters.
Glossary
- Contribution
- The sharing of performance cost among joint promisors.
- Principal and surety
- Different legal roles preserved by the section's explanation.
Frequently asked questions
Must the creditor demand only each debtor's internal share?
Absent express contrary agreement, the section permits compelling any one or more to perform the whole promise.
Is contribution always equal?
The default is equal contribution unless a contrary intention appears from the contract.
Can a principal recover its own payment from a surety under this rule?
The explanation expressly prevents that result while preserving the surety's recovery from the principal.
Need help applying this provision to your situation?
Contact BizeneedLast updated 10 October 2026