Chapter XX - Winding Up
Section 271
Section 271: circumstances in which a company may be wound up by the Tribunal
Section 271 sets out when the National Company Law Tribunal may order a company to be wound up on a petition under section 272. There are five grounds: a special resolution, acts against national interests, fraud, five years of filing default, and the just and equitable ground.
On this page
Need advice on Section 271?
This article is for general information. Refer to the Companies Act, 2013 official text for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.
Statutory text
Bare law
A company may, on a petition under section 272, be wound up by the Tribunal,—(a) if the company has, by special resolution, resolved that the company be wound up by the Tribunal; (b) if the company has acted against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality; (c) if on an application made by the Registrar or any other person authorised by the Central Government by notification under this Act, the Tribunal is of the opinion that the affairs of the company have been conducted in a fraudulent manner or the company was formed for fraudulent and unlawful purpose or the persons concerned in the formation or management of its affairs have been guilty of fraud, misfeasance or misconduct in connection therewith and that it is proper that the company be wound up; (d) if the company has made a default in filing with the Registrar its financial statements or annual returns for immediately preceding five consecutive financial years; or (e) if the Tribunal is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up.
Introduction
The present text was substituted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (section 255 and the Eleventh Schedule) with effect from 15 November 2016 under S.O. 3453(E). The section as enacted in 2013 also listed inability to pay debts as a ground; that ground does not appear in the substituted text.
Chapter XX, including section 271, was brought into force on 15 December 2016 by S.O. 3677(E). The 2013 version was therefore replaced before it ever came into force.
Key takeaways
Five grounds only
Special resolution, acts against sovereignty or public order, fraud, five consecutive years of filing default, and just and equitable.
Petition is required
The Tribunal acts on a petition under section 272; section 271 lists only the grounds.
No debt ground
Inability to pay debts is not a ground in the substituted section 271.
The five grounds
A company may be wound up by the Tribunal: (a) if it has resolved by special resolution to be wound up by the Tribunal; (b) if it has acted against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality; (c) on an application by the Registrar or a person authorised by the Central Government by notification, if the Tribunal finds fraud of the kind described in clause (c) and thinks it proper to wind the company up; (d) if the company has not filed its financial statements or annual returns with the Registrar for the immediately preceding five consecutive financial years; or (e) if the Tribunal thinks it just and equitable to wind it up.
- India Code — consolidated Companies Act, 2013, section 271
- eGazette — Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (No. 31 of 2016)
- eGazette — MCA notification S.O. 3453(E), 15 November 2016 (IBC section 255 in force)
- eGazette — MCA notification S.O. 3677(E), 7 December 2016 (commencement from 15 December 2016)
The fraud ground
Clause (c) covers affairs conducted in a fraudulent manner, a company formed for a fraudulent and unlawful purpose, and fraud, misfeasance or misconduct by the persons concerned in its formation or management. Two things are needed. The application must come from the Registrar or a person authorised by the Central Government by notification, and the Tribunal must also find it proper that the company be wound up.
What changed in 2016
The 2013 text had seven grounds, including inability to pay debts, plus a deeming provision on when a company is unable to pay its debts. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 substituted the section with effect from 15 November 2016, leaving the five grounds above. The insolvency of companies is now dealt with under that Code.
Practical preparation
Identify which clause of section 271 the facts fit; check who may petition on that ground under section 272; for a filing-default case, verify the five consecutive financial years from the Registrar’s records; for the fraud ground, note that the application must come from the Registrar or an authorised person; for a debt-recovery objective, consider the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 instead.
Practical checklist
Do
- Match the facts to a specific clause of section 271 before drafting a petition.
- Keep the company’s annual filings current to stay clear of clause (d).
Avoid
- Do not file a winding up petition under the Act merely because a debt is unpaid.
- Do not treat clause (c) as available to every shareholder; the application must come from the Registrar or a person authorised by the Central Government.
Illustrative example
Hypothetical: deadlock in a two-family company
Two families each hold half the shares in a private company. They have stopped cooperating, no board meeting has been possible for two years, and the business has stalled.
Ground
No special resolution can pass, so clause (a) is not available; the families consider the just and equitable ground in clause (e).
Petitioner
A contributory may petition under section 272(1)(b), subject to the holding conditions in section 272(2).
Alternative
Before petitioning, they also consider relief for oppression and mismanagement under sections 241 and 242.
Outcome
- Whether winding up is just and equitable is for the Tribunal to decide on the facts.
Glossary
- Tribunal
- The National Company Law Tribunal constituted under section 408.
- Just and equitable
- The residual ground in clause (e), applied when the Tribunal is of the opinion that winding up is fair in the circumstances.
Frequently asked questions
Can a creditor seek winding up under section 271 because the company has not paid its debts?
Inability to pay debts is not one of the grounds in the substituted section 271, and creditors are not listed as petitioners in section 272. Corporate insolvency is dealt with under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Can a company be wound up for not filing returns?
Yes. Clause (d) applies if it has not filed its financial statements or annual returns for the immediately preceding five consecutive financial years.
When did the current section 271 take effect?
It was substituted with effect from 15 November 2016 (S.O. 3453(E)) and brought into force with Chapter XX on 15 December 2016 (S.O. 3677(E)).
Need help applying this provision to your situation?
Contact BizeneedLast updated 11 October 2026