Press / to search

Chapter XXI - Penalties

Section 452

Section 452: penalty for failure to comply with provisions of Section 187

Section 452 permits the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty of ₹5,000 for each day a person fails to provide a facility for accepting payments through the prescribed electronic modes referred to in Section 187.

On this page

Need advice on Section 452?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

The Assessing Officer may impose on a person, a penalty of Rs. 5000 for every day of the duration of failure where he fails to provide a facility for accepting payments through the prescribed electronic modes of payment, as referred to in section 187.

Introduction

The penalty is measured by the duration of the failure. The statute says the Assessing Officer 'may impose' it; the text does not make imposition automatic.

Key takeaways

1

Trigger

Failure to provide the prescribed electronic-payment acceptance facility referred to in Section 187.

2

Daily amount

The specified penalty is ₹5,000 for every day of the duration of failure.

Penalty specified

The Assessing Officer may impose ₹5,000 for each day of failure to provide the prescribed electronic-payment facility referred to in Section 187.

When this provision applies

Establish the Section 187 duty first. It applies to a person carrying on business or profession whose total sales, turnover or gross receipts exceeded ₹50 crore in the immediately preceding tax year. The provision requires the prescribed modes in addition to other electronic modes already being provided.

The failure period matters because Section 452 states ₹5,000 for every day of its duration. Record the dates and facts showing when the required facility was unavailable and when compliance was achieved; a vague monthly estimate is not a reliable calculation.

Limits and procedural safeguards

Having some electronic payment option is not by itself proof that the prescribed modes were provided. Check the current prescription and evidence of actual availability rather than assuming any bank account, card facility or payment application is sufficient.

Section 470 includes Section 452: no penalty is imposed where reasonable cause for the failure is proved. Section 471 requires a hearing or reasonable opportunity through a show-cause notice. An outage report may be relevant evidence but does not automatically establish that defence.

Step-by-step review

1. Check the business or profession status and the immediately preceding tax year’s turnover or receipts against Section 187.

2. Identify the electronic modes prescribed for the relevant period and document which were actually available.

3. Establish the duration of any failure from activation, outage and restoration records and calculate ₹5,000 per day.

4. Respond to the notice with the duty analysis, day count and any evidence proving reasonable cause.

Hypothetical example

Hypothetical illustration: a covered business has an established failure lasting four days. The Section 452 measure is 4 × ₹5,000 = ₹20,000. This example assumes both the underlying duty and four-day failure are established; the penalty procedure and any Section 470 defence must still be considered.

Records to prepare

Immediately preceding tax year sales, turnover or gross-receipt records.

The applicable prescribed modes and onboarding or activation evidence.

Dated outage, support and restoration records, plus the notice and response.

Official amended Act source

Step-by-step flow for applying Section 452

  1. 1

    Is the person carrying on a business or profession?

    Section 187 applies only to such a person.

    • No: Section 187 and Section 452 do not apply.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  2. 2

    Did total sales, turnover or gross receipts exceed fifty crore rupees in the immediately preceding tax year?

    This is the threshold in section 187(b).

    • No: No duty under section 187 for the year, so Section 452 does not apply.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  3. 3

    Did the person provide a facility for accepting payment through the prescribed electronic modes?

    The modes are prescribed under section 187; offering some other electronic method is not enough.

    • Yes, throughout: No failure, so no penalty.
    • No, for some period: Go to the next step.
  4. 4

    Count the duration of the failure

    Establish the days for which the facility was not provided, using activation and outage records.

  5. 5

    Fix the penalty

    The Assessing Officer may impose ₹5,000 for every day of the duration of the failure. Section 452 states no upper limit.

Practical checklist

Do

  • Check whether section 187 required the prescribed electronic-payment facility for the person and period involved.
  • Record each day of the facility failure separately when reviewing the proposed ₹5,000-per-day amount.
  • Immediately preceding tax year sales, turnover or gross-receipt records.
  • The applicable prescribed modes and onboarding or activation evidence.
  • Dated outage, support and restoration records, plus the notice and response.

Avoid

  • Do not compute this daily penalty without first establishing the section 187 duty and failure duration.

Illustrative example

Worked example: a delayed payment facility

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): A retail chain had turnover of ₹62 crore in the preceding tax year. In the current year it did not offer the prescribed electronic payment modes for its first 40 days of trading, though it accepted card payments. The turnover and the 40 days are assumed for illustration.

  1. Threshold

    ₹62 crore exceeds fifty crore rupees, so section 187 applies for the current year.

  2. Failure

    Card payments do not count unless they are among the prescribed modes. The chain did not provide the prescribed facility for 40 days.

  3. Penalty measure

    40 × ₹5,000 = ₹2,00,000.

  4. Discretion

    The Assessing Officer "may" impose the penalty. Records showing the date the prescribed facility went live fix the end of the failure period.

Outcome

  • Possible penalty under Section 452: ₹2,00,000 for 40 days of failure.
  • Which electronic modes are required is left to the rules prescribed under section 187.

Glossary

Prescribed electronic modes
The particular modes specified under the applicable prescription, not every electronic method in use.
Duration of failure
The established period during which the required payment facility was not provided.

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily amount stated in Section 452?

₹5,000 for every day of the duration of failure.

Is the penalty automatic under the wording of this section?

The provision says the Assessing Officer 'may impose' the penalty.

Is an existing electronic payment option necessarily sufficient?

No. Check the modes prescribed under Section 187; the statutory duty is additional to other electronic modes already provided.

Does a temporary outage automatically excuse the failure?

No automatic exemption is stated here. Section 470 permits a proved reasonable-cause defence, for which the outage record and other facts may be relevant.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Get help responding to a Section 187 penalty notice

Last updated 10 October 2026