Press / to search

Chapter XXI - Penalties

Section 450

Section 450: penalty for failure to comply with provisions of Section 185

Section 450 permits a penalty when a person takes or accepts a loan, deposit or specified sum contrary to Section 185. The Assessing Officer may impose an amount equal to the sum taken or accepted in contravention.

On this page

Need advice on Section 450?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

If a person takes or accepts any loan or deposit or specified sum in contravention of the provisions of section 185, the Assessing Officer may impose on him, a penalty equal to the amount of the loan or deposit or specified sum so taken or accepted.

Introduction

Section 450 concerns taking or accepting a loan, deposit or specified sum contrary to section 185. It permits the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty equal to the amount taken or accepted in breach.

Key takeaways

1

Trigger

Taking or accepting a loan, deposit or specified sum in contravention of Section 185.

2

Amount

The possible penalty equals the amount so taken or accepted.

Contravention and penalty

If the taking or acceptance of a covered loan, deposit or specified sum contravenes Section 185, the Assessing Officer may impose a penalty equal to that amount.

When this provision applies

First determine whether the taking or acceptance contravened Section 185. Review the transaction classification, permitted payment mode, aggregation with relevant unpaid amounts, the parties and the statutory exceptions. The amount of a single receipt viewed in isolation may not answer that question.

Section 450 concerns the person taking or accepting the loan, deposit or specified sum. Its penalty base is the amount so taken or accepted in contravention, not a flat fee and not merely the part exceeding a threshold.

Limits and procedural safeguards

Do not treat every cash receipt as a Section 185 loan or deposit. The Chapter also defines specified sum, and Section 185 contains particular exceptions and special conditions. Identify the applicable category before computing a proposed penalty.

Section 470 includes Section 450 and prevents the penalty where reasonable cause for the failure is proved. Section 471 requires a hearing or reasonable opportunity through a show-cause notice. The words “may impose” should not be converted into an automatic penalty charge.

Step-by-step review

1. Classify the receipt under Section 185 and the relevant Chapter definitions.

2. Check the payment mode, current and relevant unpaid amounts, parties and all potentially applicable exceptions.

3. If a contravention is established, identify the amount taken or accepted in contravention as the Section 450 base.

4. Prepare the notice response with transaction evidence and any proved reasonable-cause case under Section 470.

Hypothetical example

Hypothetical illustration: assume a ₹60,000 loan was accepted in a manner that contravenes Section 185, after its conditions and exceptions have been checked. The possible Section 450 penalty is measured by ₹60,000, not only an amount above the applicable threshold. This assumes the contravention; it does not establish one merely from the transaction amount.

Records to prepare

Loan, deposit or property-related documentation identifying the nature of the sum.

Receipt and banking records, relevant unpaid balances and party details.

The exception analysis, notice response and evidence of any reasonable cause.

Official amended Act source

Step-by-step flow for applying Section 450

  1. 1

    Did the person take or accept a loan, deposit or specified sum?

    • No: Section 450 does not apply.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  2. 2

    Was it received through an account payee cheque, account payee bank draft, electronic clearing system through a bank account, or other prescribed electronic mode?

    These are the permitted modes in section 185(1).

    • Yes: No contravention of section 185, so Section 450 does not apply.
    • No: Go to the next step.
  3. 3

    Is the amount, alone or with earlier unpaid amounts from the same person, ₹20,000 or more?

    This is the test in section 185(1)(i) to (iii). Under section 185(4), the limit is ₹2,00,000 for deposits and loans between a primary agricultural credit society or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank and its member.

    • No: Section 185(1) is not breached.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  4. 4

    Is the transaction covered by an exclusion in section 185(2) or 185(3)?

    For example, loans or deposits taken or accepted from or by the Government, a banking company, post office savings bank or co-operative bank.

    • Yes: Section 185(1) does not apply, so there is no penalty.
    • No: Go to the next step.
  5. 5

    Fix the penalty

    The Assessing Officer may impose a penalty equal to the amount of the loan, deposit or specified sum so taken or accepted.

Practical checklist

Do

  • Identify the loan, deposit or specified sum and its method and date of acceptance.
  • Apply the thresholds and exceptions in section 185 to the actual transaction before measuring any breach.
  • Loan, deposit or property-related documentation identifying the nature of the sum.
  • Receipt and banking records, relevant unpaid balances and party details.
  • The exception analysis, notice response and evidence of any reasonable cause.

Avoid

  • Do not apply the equal-amount penalty merely because a payment was in cash; first check whether section 185 was contravened.

Illustrative example

Worked example: a cash loan from a friend

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): A shop owner accepts a loan of ₹1,50,000 in cash from a friend to buy stock. No earlier loan from that friend is outstanding. Neither of them falls within the exclusions in section 185(2). The amount is assumed for illustration.

  1. Mode

    Cash is not one of the modes allowed by section 185(1).

  2. Amount test

    ₹1,50,000 is more than ₹20,000, the limit in section 185(1), so the loan is taken in contravention of section 185.

  3. Penalty measure

    Section 450 allows a penalty equal to the loan so taken: ₹1,50,000.

  4. Discretion

    The Assessing Officer "may" impose the penalty. Had the loan been received by account payee cheque or through a bank account by electronic clearing system, there would be no contravention.

Outcome

  • Possible penalty under Section 450: ₹1,50,000, the full amount of the loan.
  • The penalty falls on the person who takes or accepts the loan, not on the lender.

Glossary

Contravention
A failure to satisfy the applicable requirements of Section 185, after its conditions and exceptions are considered.
Penalty base
The amount of the loan, deposit or specified sum taken or accepted in contravention.

Frequently asked questions

Which transaction does Section 450 address?

Taking or accepting a loan, deposit or specified sum contrary to Section 185.

Is the penalty automatic?

The section says the Assessing Officer 'may impose' a penalty equal to the amount taken or accepted in contravention.

Is the penalty limited to the amount above the Section 185 threshold?

Section 450 measures the amount taken or accepted in contravention, not merely the excess above a threshold. First establish the contravention.

Can I rely on reasonable cause?

Section 470 covers this penalty. The person must prove reasonable cause for the failure with relevant evidence.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Get help responding to a cash loan/deposit penalty notice

Last updated 10 October 2026