Press / to search

Chapter XIX - Collection and Recovery of Tax

Section 401

Section 401: bar against direct demand on the assessee

Section 401 is a short but important taxpayer protection - once tax has actually been deducted at source from an assessee's income, the tax department cannot separately call upon the assessee to pay that same tax again, even if the deductor fails to deposit it.

On this page

Need advice on Section 401?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

Where tax is deductible at the source under this Chapter, the assessee shall not be called upon to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income.

Introduction

Section 401 prevents a direct demand on an assessee for tax that has actually been deducted from that assessee’s income at source under this Chapter.

Its protection is measured by the amount deducted. The wording does not treat tax that should have been deducted, but was not, as already paid by the recipient. A deduction dispute therefore turns on whether and how much tax was in fact withheld from the relevant income.

Key takeaways

1

Actual deduction is the trigger

The provision applies to the extent tax has been deducted from the income; a mere obligation to deduct is not the same thing.

2

It blocks duplicate direct demand

The assessee cannot be called upon to pay the deducted amount directly again.

3

The scope is limited to this Chapter

The section speaks of tax deductible at source under the Chapter and the income from which it was deducted.

What Section 401 says

"Where tax is deductible at the source under this Chapter, the assessee shall not be called upon to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income."

When this provision applies

Identify the income, the applicable source-deduction obligation and the amount actually withheld. The protection follows the actual deduction from that income; an expected deduction or a contractual promise to deduct is not the same fact.

Compare the direct demand with the deduction evidence. The protected portion should be matched to the same income and tax year, with any other outstanding tax separately identified.

Limits and procedural safeguards

The provision bars a direct demand to the extent of actual deduction. It does not automatically erase other tax payable by the assessee or resolve every difference in a tax-credit statement.

A missing credit entry and a failure to deduct are different issues. Preserve proof of actual withholding and pursue the applicable correction or demand-response process rather than assume a portal mismatch settles the statutory question.

Step-by-step review

1. Identify the income and payment from which tax was deductible.

2. Reconcile the gross payment, actual deduction and net receipt.

3. Match the deducted portion with the demand and isolate any amount not covered by Section 401.

4. Submit the deduction evidence through the applicable response process and retain the resulting correction or decision.

Hypothetical example

Hypothetical illustration: a payer actually withholds ₹20,000 from an assessee’s income but the deduction is not reflected in the credit statement. Section 401’s protection turns on the proved deduction, not merely the missing display entry. The assessee should reconcile and document that ₹20,000; any separate tax liability remains a separate question.

Records to prepare

Payment advice, deduction certificate and bank records showing gross, deducted and net amounts.

The relevant demand, return and tax-credit reconciliation.

Correspondence with the deductor and acknowledgement of the demand response or correction request.

Official amended Act source

Step-by-step flow for applying Section 401

  1. 1

    Is tax deductible at source on this income under Chapter XIX?

    • No: Section 401 does not apply to that income.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  2. 2

    How much tax was actually deducted from that income?

    The bar works "to the extent to which tax has been deducted". Use the gross payment, the amount withheld and the net receipt as evidence.

  3. 3

    Does the demand on the assessee relate to the same income?

    Match the demand to the income from which tax was deducted and to the same tax year.

  4. 4

    Apply the bar to the deducted portion

    The assessee cannot be called upon to pay that portion himself. Any balance of tax on the income is a separate question outside Section 401.

Practical checklist

Do

  • Retain records showing the relevant payment and actual tax withheld when contesting a direct demand.
  • Payment advice, deduction certificate and bank records showing gross, deducted and net amounts.
  • The relevant demand, return and tax-credit reconciliation.
  • Correspondence with the deductor and acknowledgement of the demand response or correction request.

Avoid

  • Do not treat an amount that was never deducted as protected by section 401.

Illustrative example

Worked example: TDS deducted but not deposited

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): Mr. Kumar receives a contract payment of ₹3,00,000 (assumed). The payer deducts tax of ₹30,000 (assumed) and pays him ₹2,70,000, but does not deposit the tax. The department proposes a direct demand of ₹45,000 (assumed) on Mr. Kumar as tax on that income.

  1. Deductible at source

    Tax was deductible at source on the payment under Chapter XIX, so Section 401 is relevant.

  2. Actual deduction

    The payment advice and bank record show ₹3,00,000 − ₹30,000 = ₹2,70,000 received, so ₹30,000 was deducted.

  3. Protected portion

    Mr. Kumar cannot be called upon to pay the ₹30,000 himself.

  4. Balance

    The remaining ₹45,000 − ₹30,000 = ₹15,000 is not covered by Section 401 and has to be examined on its own merits.

Outcome

  • Up to ₹30,000 of the demand cannot be raised directly on Mr. Kumar.
  • The payer's failure to deposit is dealt with under other provisions, such as Section 398.

Glossary

Actual withholding
Tax in fact deducted from the income, rather than an amount that merely ought to have been deducted.
Protected portion
The amount of the direct demand corresponding to tax actually deducted from that income.

Section 401 protects the recipient from a direct demand for the portion of tax actually deducted from the relevant income at source.

Frequently asked questions

If my employer deducts TDS but does not deposit it, can the tax department demand it from me?

No - to the extent tax has actually been deducted from your income, Section 401 bars the department from calling upon you to pay that tax directly; the recovery action instead falls on the deductor under Section 398.

Does Section 401 remove unrelated tax liabilities?

No. Its protection is limited to the extent tax has been deducted from the relevant income.

Is a missing credit entry the same as proof that no tax was deducted?

No. Reconcile the records and establish the actual deduction; credit correction and the direct-demand protection are distinct issues.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Get help responding to a tax demand despite TDS deduction

Last updated 10 October 2026