Press / to search

Chapter IV - Computation of Total Income

Section 36

Section 36: expenses or payments not deductible in certain circumstances

Section 36 overrides other provisions of the Act to disallow two broad categories of business expenditure: payments to related "specified persons" that the Assessing Officer considers excessive or unreasonable, and payments made otherwise than through banking or online channels once they cross a threshold.

On this page

Need advice on Section 36?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

(1) The provisions of this section shall have effect irrespective of anything to the contrary contained in any other provision of this Act relating to computation of income under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”. (2) If the assessee incurs any expenditure for which payment has been or is to be made to any “specified person”, which in the opinion of the Assessing Officer is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the–– (a) fair market value of the goods, services or facilities; or (b) legitimate needs of the business or profession of the assessee; or (c) benefit derived by or accruing to the assessee therefrom, so much of the expenditure as considered excessive or unreasonable by him shall not be allowed as a deduction. (3) For the purposes of sub-section (2) and this sub-section,–– (a) “specified person” shall mean the following,–– (i) in relation to an assessee mentioned in column B of the Table below, the person referred to in column C thereof:—

Sl. No.AssesseeSpecified person
1Individual.Any relative of the assessee.
2Company.Any director of the company or his relative.
3Firm.Partner of the firm or his relative.
4Association of persons.Member of the association or his relative.
5Hindu undivided family.Member of the family or his relative;

(ii) any person being an individual or company or firm or association of persons or Hindu undivided family having substantial interest in the business or profession of the assessee, or any director, partner, member thereof or any relatives of such individual, director, partner, member or any other company in which the first mentioned company has substantial interest; (iii) a company, firm, association of persons, or Hindu undivided family whose director, partner or member has substantial interest in the business or profession of the assessee, or any director, partner or member thereof and their relatives, as the case may be; (iv) any person carrying on a business or profession, where assessee, being–– (A) an individual or his relative; or (B) a company, its directors or their relatives; or (C) a firm, its partners or their relatives; or (D) an association of persons, its members or their relatives; or (E) a Hindu undivided family, its members or their relatives, has substantial interest in the business or profession of such person; (b) a person is deemed to have “substantial interest in the business or profession” if— (i) in a case where the business or profession is carried on by a company, such person is, at any time during the tax year, the beneficial owner of shares (not being shares entitled to a fixed rate of dividend whether with or without a right to participate in profits) carrying not less than 20% of the voting power; and (ii) in any other case, such person is, at any time during the tax year, beneficially entitled to not less than 20% of the profits of such business or profession. (4) Where in respect of any expenditure incurred by the assessee, any payment or aggregate of payments made in a day to a person exceeds ₹10000 and is not made through specified banking or online mode, then the expenditure by way of such payments shall not be allowed as a deduction. (5) Where any deduction was made in any preceding tax year for a liability incurred for any expenditure and payment in respect of such liability is made during a subsequent tax year and if such payment or aggregate of payments made in a day to a person exceeds ₹10000 and is not made through specified banking or online mode, such payment shall be deemed to be the income under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession” in such subsequent tax year. (6) For the purposes of sub-sections (4) and (5), the figures “₹10000” shall be read as “₹35000” in case the payment is made for plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages. (7) The provisions of sub-sections (4) and (5) shall not be applicable in cases and circumstances, as may be prescribed, having regard to the nature and extent of banking facilities available, considerations of business expediency and other relevant factors. (8) Nothing (with reference to mode of payment) contained in any other law in force or in any contract, shall apply in respect of any payment which has been made through specified banking or online mode, in compliance of sub-sections (4) to (7), and no plea shall be allowed to be raised, in any suit or other proceeding on the ground that the payment was not made or tendered in cash or in mode other than through specified banking or online mode. (9) No deduction or allowance shall be allowed in respect of marked to market loss or other expected loss, except as allowable under section 32(1)(h).

Introduction

The section targets amounts that might otherwise qualify as business costs but fail related-party reasonableness or payment-mode tests. A separate mark-to-market loss restriction also applies.

Key takeaways

1

Related-party payments

Expenditure paid to a specified related person can be disallowed to the extent the Assessing Officer finds it excessive or unreasonable by the statutory tests.

2

Payment mode matters

Cash or other non-prescribed payments beyond the section's daily limit are generally disallowed, subject to the specified exceptions; a later non-compliant payment can recapture an earlier deduction.

Excessive or unreasonable payments to a specified person

Section 36(2) allows the Assessing Officer to disallow the excessive or unreasonable part of any expenditure paid or payable to a "specified person", judged against the fair market value of the goods/services/facilities, the legitimate needs of the business, or the benefit actually derived by the assessee.

Who is a "specified person"

Section 36(3) defines "specified person" broadly to include relatives and persons with a controlling or substantial interest:

AssesseeSpecified person
IndividualAny relative of the assessee
CompanyAny director of the company, or his/her relative
FirmAny partner of the firm, or his/her relative
Association of personsAny member of the association, or his/her relative
Hindu undivided familyAny member of the family, or his/her relative

Substantial interest and related entities

The definition also extends to any person (individual, company, firm, AOP or HUF) having a "substantial interest" in the assessee's business or profession, and to related directors, partners, members and their relatives, as well as entities in which such persons in turn have substantial interest.

A person is deemed to have "substantial interest" in a company if they beneficially own shares (other than fixed-dividend shares) carrying not less than 20% of the voting power at any time in the tax year; in any other case, if they are beneficially entitled to not less than 20% of the profits of the business or profession at any time in the tax year.

Cash payment disallowance (₹10,000 / ₹35,000 threshold)

Section 36(4) disallows any expenditure where payment (or aggregate payments in a day to one person) exceeds ₹10,000 and is not made through a specified banking or online mode.

Section 36(6) raises this threshold to ₹35,000 specifically for payments made for plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages.

Section 36(5) applies the same disallowance retrospectively: if a deduction was claimed in an earlier year for a liability, and the actual payment made in a later year (exceeding the threshold, otherwise than by banking/online mode) is made in cash, that payment is treated as income of the assessee in the later year.

Section 36(7) allows exceptions to be prescribed, having regard to the nature/extent of available banking facilities, business expediency, and other relevant factors.

Marked-to-market losses

Section 36(9) confirms that no deduction is allowed for marked-to-market loss or other expected loss, except to the extent allowable under Section 32(1)(h).

Step-by-step flow for applying Section 36

  1. 1

    Is the payment to a "specified person" under Section 36(3)?

    For example, relatives, directors, partners or members, or persons with substantial interest (20% of voting power or profits).

    • Yes: Check whether the Assessing Officer may treat any part as excessive or unreasonable under Section 36(2).
    • No: Go to the next step.
  2. 2

    Was any payment, or the aggregate paid in a day to one person, above ₹10,000 otherwise than by specified banking or online mode?

    The limit is ₹35,000 for payments for plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages (Section 36(6)).

    • Yes: The expenditure is not deductible under Section 36(4), unless a prescribed exception applies.
    • No: Go to the next step.
  3. 3

    Was a liability allowed in an earlier year and paid this year in such a mode above the limit?

    • Yes: The payment is deemed business income this year under Section 36(5).
    • No: Go to the next step.
  4. 4

    Is any claim for a marked-to-market or other expected loss?

    • Yes: Not allowed, except as allowable under Section 32(1)(h) (Section 36(9)).

Practical checklist

Do

  • Identify specified related recipients and retain a commercial basis for the payment amount.
  • Review each person's payments by day against the applicable cash-payment threshold and statutory exceptions.
  • Separate realised losses from expected mark-to-market losses.

Avoid

  • Do not assume an arm's-length-looking invoice alone resolves the related-party test.
  • Do not split a same-day cash payment to avoid the threshold calculation.

Illustrative example

Worked example: cash payments to a supplier

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): A retailer pays a local supplier ₹8,000 in cash in the morning and another ₹6,000 in cash the same evening against purchase invoices. On another day it pays a transporter ₹30,000 in cash for hiring a goods carriage.

  1. Same-day aggregation

    Section 36(4) looks at the aggregate paid to one person in a day: ₹14,000, which exceeds ₹10,000.

  2. Supplier payments

    Both cash payments were made otherwise than by specified banking or online mode, so ₹14,000 of purchase expenditure is not deductible.

  3. Transporter

    For goods-carriage hire the limit is ₹35,000 under Section 36(6); ₹30,000 is within it.

Outcome

  • ₹14,000 is disallowed; the transporter payment is allowable.
  • Paying through specified banking or online modes avoids the issue entirely.

Glossary

Specified person
A related recipient within Section 36's relationship list for the excessive-payment rule.
Mark-to-market loss
An expected loss recorded from revaluing an item rather than a completed transaction, restricted by subsection (9).

Frequently asked questions

What is the cash payment limit before a business expense gets disallowed?

₹10,000 per day to a single person, unless paid through a specified banking or online mode. The limit is raised to ₹35,000 for payments made for plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages.

Who counts as a "specified person" for the excessive-payment disallowance?

Relatives (for individuals), directors and their relatives (for companies), partners and their relatives (for firms), members and their relatives (for AOPs and HUFs), and, more broadly, any person or entity having a substantial interest (broadly, 20% or more voting power or profit share) in the assessee's business.

What happens if a cash payment is made in a later year for an expense already deducted earlier?

Under Section 36(5), if such a payment exceeds ₹10,000 (or ₹35,000 for goods carriages) in a day and is not made through a specified banking or online mode, it is treated as income of the assessee in the year the payment is made.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Review related-party and cash payments with our tax audit team

Last updated 10 October 2026