Chapter XXIII - Miscellaneous
Section 515
Section 515: appearance through an authorised representative
Section 515 is the general rule on who can represent an assessee before an income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal. It defines "authorised representative" and "accountant" in detail, and separately lists who is disqualified from acting as a representative, whether due to removal from Government service, a disqualifying conviction or penalty, insolvency, or professional misconduct.
On this page
Need advice on Section 515?
This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.
Statutory text
Bare law
(1) An assessee, entitled or required to attend before any income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal for any proceeding under this Act, may attend through an authorised representative.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply where an assessee is required to attend personally for examination on oath or affirmation under section 246.
(3) For the purposes of this section,–– (a) “authorised representative” means a person authorised by the assessee, in writing, to appear on his behalf, being— (i) a person related to or regularly employed by the assessee in any manner; or (ii) any officer of a scheduled bank with which the assessee maintains a current account or has other regular dealings; or (iii) any legal practitioner, who is entitled to practise in any civil court in India; or (iv) an accountant; or (v) any person, who has passed any accountancy examination recognised by the Board; or (vi) any person, who has acquired such educational qualifications, as may be prescribed; or (vii) any person who, before the coming into force of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the Union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Goa, Daman and Diu, or Pondicherry, attended before an income-tax authority in the said territory on behalf of any assessee otherwise than as an employee or relative of that assessee; or (viii) any other person who was an authorised representative in accordance with the provisions of section 288(2)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961;or (ix) any other person as may be prescribed; (b) “accountant” means a chartered accountant as defined in section 2(1)(b) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, who holds a valid certificate of practice under section 6(1) of that Act, but does not include [except for representing the assessee under sub-section (1)],— (i) in case of an assessee, being a company, a person who is not eligible for appointment as an auditor of the said company under section 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013; or (ii) in any other case,— (A) the assessee himself, or in the case of being a firm or association of persons or a Hindu undivided family, any partner of such firm or a member of such association or such Hindu undivided family; (B) for an assessee, being a registered non-profit organisation, any person referred to in section 355(h)(i) or (ii) or (iii) or (iv); (C) for any person other than the persons referred to in sub-clauses (A) and (B), the person who is competent to verify the return under section 263 as per section 265; (D) any relative of any of the persons referred to in sub-clauses (A), (B) and (C); (E) an officer or employee of the assessee; (F) an individual, who, is a partner, or who is in the employment, of an officer or employee of the assessee; (G) an individual, who or his relative or partner— (I) is holding any security of, or interest in, the assessee and the face value of such security or interest held by his relative does not exceed ₹100000; (II) is indebted to the assessee, and such debt in case of his relative does not exceed ₹100000; (III) has given a guarantee or provided security in connection with the indebtedness of a third person to the assessee and such relative gives a guarantee or provides security for an amount not exceeding ₹100000; (H) a person who, whether directly or indirectly, has business relationship with the assessee of such nature, as may be prescribed; (I) a person convicted by a court of an offence involving fraud and ten years has not elapsed from the date of such conviction. (4) No person,— (a) who has been dismissed or removed from Government service; or (b) who has been convicted of an offence connected with any income-tax proceeding or on whom a penalty has been imposed under this Act, except a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(ii) or 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or section 465(1)(d) of this Act; or (c) who has become an insolvent; or (d) who has been convicted by a court for an offence involving fraud, shall be qualified to represent an assessee under sub-section (1), for–– (i) all times, in case of a person referred to in clause (a); (ii) such time as the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may by order determine, in case of a person referred to in clause (b); (iii) the period during which the insolvency continues, in case of a person referred to in clause (c); and (iv) ten years from the date of conviction, in case of a person referred to in clause (d).
(5) If a person,— (a) who is a legal practitioner or an accountant, is found guilty of misconduct in his professional capacity by any authority authorised to institute disciplinary proceedings against him, the order passed by that authority shall affect his right to attend before an income-tax authority in the same manner as it affects his right to practise as a legal practitioner or accountant, as the case may be; (b) who is not a legal practitioner or an accountant, and is found guilty of misconduct in any income-tax proceedings by the prescribed income-tax authority, he may be directed by such authority that he shall henceforth be disqualified from representing an assessee under sub-section (1).
(6) Every order or direction under sub-section (4)(b) or (5)(b) shall be subject to the following conditions:— (a) no such order or direction shall be made against any person unless he has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard; (b) any person against whom such an order or direction is made may, within one month of the said order or direction, appeal to the Board to have the order or direction cancelled; and (c) no such order or direction shall take effect until one month has passed from the making thereof, or, if an appeal has been filed, until the disposal of the appeal.
(7) A person disqualified to represent an assessee by virtue of section 61(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 or section 288(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 shall be disqualified to represent an assessee under sub-section (1).
(8) For the purposes of this section, the expression “relative”, in relation to an individual, means— (a) spouse of the individual; (b) brother or sister of the individual; (c) brother or sister of the spouse of the individual; (d) any lineal ascendant (maternal or paternal) or descendant of the individual; (e) any lineal ascendant (maternal or paternal) or descendant of the spouse of the individual; (f) spouse of a person referred to in clauses (b), (c), (d) or (e); (g) any lineal descendant of a brother or sister of either the individual or the spouse of the individual.
Introduction
Section 515 permits representation before income-tax authorities and the Tribunal through a person authorised in writing, but personal attendance can still be required for examination on oath. The section also defines eligible representative categories, professional-accountant restrictions and disqualification procedures.
Key takeaways
Written authority
An authorised representative appears by written authorisation and must fall within a statutory category.
Personal oath exception
Representation does not replace personal attendance required for examination on oath or affirmation under section 246.
Qualification limits
Subsection (3) defines eligible categories; subsections (4), (5) and (7) set the disqualifications, and professional status alone does not override them.
General right of representation
An assessee entitled or required to attend before any income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal for any proceeding under the Act may attend through an authorised representative.
This does not apply where the assessee is required to attend personally for examination on oath or affirmation under section 246.
Who counts as an "authorised representative"
A person authorised by the assessee in writing to appear on their behalf, being:
- a person related to or regularly employed by the assessee;
- any officer of a scheduled bank with which the assessee maintains a current account or has other regular dealings;
- any legal practitioner entitled to practise in any civil court in India;
- an accountant;
- any person who has passed an accountancy examination recognised by the Board;
- any person with such other prescribed educational qualifications;
- any person who, before the Income-tax Act, 1961 came into force in Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Goa, Daman and Diu, or Pondicherry, attended before an income-tax authority there on behalf of an assessee (not as an employee or relative);
- any other person who was an authorised representative under section 288(2)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; or
- any other prescribed person.
Meaning of "accountant"
"Accountant" means a chartered accountant as defined in section 2(1)(b) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, holding a valid certificate of practice under section 6(1) of that Act - but, except for representing an assessee under sub-section (1), it excludes:
- for a company assessee, a person not eligible for appointment as its auditor under section 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013;
- the assessee themselves, or (for a firm/AOP/HUF) any partner or member;
- for a registered non-profit organisation, any person referred to in section 355(h)(i)-(iv);
- for other persons, the person competent to verify the return under section 263 read with section 265;
- any relative of the persons above;
- an officer or employee of the assessee, or an individual who is a partner of, or employed by, such an officer or employee;
- an individual (or their relative/partner) holding a security or interest in the assessee above ₹1,00,000 face value, or indebted to the assessee above ₹1,00,000, or having given a guarantee/security for a third party's indebtedness to the assessee above ₹1,00,000;
- a person with a prescribed business relationship with the assessee; and
- a person convicted of an offence involving fraud where ten years has not elapsed since conviction.
Who is disqualified from representing an assessee
No person is qualified to represent an assessee if they:
- have been dismissed or removed from Government service - disqualified for all time;
- have been convicted of an offence connected with an income-tax proceeding, or have had a penalty imposed under the Act (except a penalty under section 271(1)(ii) or 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or section 465(1)(d) of this Act) - disqualified for the period the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner determines;
- have become insolvent - disqualified while the insolvency continues; or
- have been convicted by a court of an offence involving fraud - disqualified for ten years from the date of conviction.
Disqualification for professional misconduct
If a legal practitioner or accountant is found guilty of professional misconduct by an authority authorised to institute disciplinary proceedings against them, that order affects their right to represent an assessee in the same way it affects their right to practise as such.
If a representative who is not a legal practitioner or accountant is found guilty of misconduct in income-tax proceedings by the prescribed income-tax authority, that authority may direct that they are henceforth disqualified from representing an assessee.
Conditions applying to any disqualification order
Every order or direction disqualifying a representative for misconduct is subject to:
- no such order being made without giving the person a reasonable opportunity of being heard;
- the person's right to appeal to the Board within one month to have the order or direction cancelled; and
- the order or direction not taking effect until one month has passed, or, if an appeal is filed, until it is disposed of.
Carry-forward of past disqualifications
A person disqualified under section 61(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, or section 288(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, remains disqualified to represent an assessee under this section.
Meaning of "relative"
For this section, "relative", in relation to an individual, means the spouse; a brother or sister of the individual or their spouse; any lineal ascendant or descendant (maternal or paternal) of the individual or their spouse; the spouse of any of these; and any lineal descendant of a brother or sister of the individual or their spouse.
Step-by-step flow for applying Section 515
- 1
Is the assessee entitled or required to attend before an income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal in a proceeding under the Act?
If so, Section 515(1) allows attendance through an authorised representative.
- No: Section 515 is not needed.
- Yes: Go to the next step.
- 2
Must the assessee attend personally for examination on oath or affirmation under section 246?
- Yes: The assessee must attend in person for that examination (Section 515(2)).
- No: Go to the next step.
- 3
Is the representative authorised in writing and within Section 515(3)(a)?
The categories include a relative or regular employee, an officer of a scheduled bank with which the assessee has a current account or regular dealings, a legal practitioner entitled to practise in a civil court in India, an accountant, a person who passed a Board-recognised accountancy examination, and other listed or prescribed persons. For an accountant, read the definition and exclusions in Section 515(3)(b), including its bracketed words on representing the assessee under sub-section (1).
- 4
Is the person disqualified?
Under Section 515(4): dismissal or removal from Government service bars for all times; conviction connected with an income-tax proceeding or a penalty under the Act (other than the excepted ones) bars for the time fixed by order; insolvency bars while it continues; conviction for fraud bars for ten years from the conviction. Section 515(5) covers misconduct, and Section 515(7) carries over disqualifications under the 1922 and 1961 Acts.
- Yes: The person cannot represent the assessee for the period stated.
- No: The person may represent the assessee.
- 5
If an order or direction under Section 515(4)(b) or 515(5)(b) is proposed, apply the safeguards
Under Section 515(6): a reasonable opportunity of being heard; appeal to the Board within one month; and the order does not take effect until one month has passed or, if an appeal is filed, until it is disposed of.
Practical checklist
Do
- Keep a written authority naming the representative and confirm that the person fits a category listed in section 515(3)(a).
- Where a chartered accountant represents you, check the valid certificate of practice; the exclusions listed in section 515(3)(b) do not apply to representation under sub-section (1), but they do where the Act uses "accountant" for other purposes.
- Attend personally if the authority requires examination on oath or affirmation under section 246.
- If a disqualification order is proposed, track the hearing, one-month Board appeal period and the rule delaying its effect.
Avoid
- Do not treat authorisation as an exemption from mandatory personal examination.
- Do not assume a professional’s ordinary qualification overrides a section 515(4) disqualification.
Illustrative example
Worked example: choosing a representative
Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): Ms. Das has a hearing before an income-tax authority. She considers two people: Mr. Rai, a legal practitioner entitled to practise in civil courts in India, and Mr. Lal, who was convicted by a court of an offence involving fraud on 1 July 2020. A third person, Mr. Bose, is not a legal practitioner or accountant; on 10 January 2027 the prescribed authority, after hearing him, directs that he is disqualified for misconduct. All facts are assumed.
Mr. Rai
He falls within Section 515(3)(a)(iii). With a written authority from Ms. Das he can represent her.
Mr. Lal
Under Section 515(4)(d) and clause (iv), he is barred for ten years from 1 July 2020, that is until 1 July 2030.
Mr. Bose
Under Section 515(6)(c), the direction does not take effect until one month has passed, that is 10 February 2027, or, if he appeals to the Board within one month, until the appeal is disposed of.
Personal attendance
If Ms. Das is summoned for examination on oath under section 246, she must attend herself.
Outcome
- Ms. Das appoints Mr. Rai in writing.
- Mr. Lal cannot represent anyone before 1 July 2030.
Glossary
- Authorised representative
- A person authorised in writing by the assessee who falls within a category in section 515(3)(a).
- Disqualification
- A statutory bar or misconduct-based direction restricting a person’s right to represent an assessee under section 515.
Frequently asked questions
Who can act as my authorised representative before the income-tax authorities?
A wide range of people, including a relative or regular employee, an officer of your bank, a legal practitioner, an accountant (broadly a practising chartered accountant), a person who has passed a Board-recognised accountancy exam, or certain other prescribed persons - provided you authorise them in writing.
Can my own chartered accountant always act as my "accountant" representative?
Generally yes, if they are a chartered accountant holding a valid certificate of practice and you authorise them in writing. Because of the bracketed words in Section 515(3)(b), the exclusions listed in that clause (for example, a partner, relative or employee of the assessee) do not apply when the chartered accountant represents you under Section 515(1); they matter where the Act uses "accountant" for other purposes. The person must still not be disqualified under Section 515(4), (5) or (7); for example, a conviction for an offence involving fraud bars representation for ten years from the date of conviction.
Is a disqualification for professional misconduct permanent?
Not automatically for every case - for a person removed from Government service it is for all time, but for other disqualifying situations (like a penalty imposed under the Act) the relevant Commissioner determines the period, and for insolvency the disqualification lasts only while the insolvency continues.
If I'm disqualified, can I appeal?
Yes - Section 515(6) lets a person against whom a disqualification order or direction is made appeal to the Board within one month, and the order doesn't take effect until that month passes or, if appealed, until the appeal is disposed of.
Need help applying this provision to your situation?
Talk to our tax team about representation before tax authoritiesLast updated 10 October 2026