Press / to search

Chapter XXI - Penalties

Section 469

Section 469: power to reduce or waive penalty

Section 469 gives senior tax officials - the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner - discretionary power to reduce or fully waive a penalty imposed under Section 439 (under-reporting/misreporting of income), where they're satisfied the taxpayer meets certain conditions.

On this page

Need advice on Section 469?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

(1) Irrespective of anything contained in this Act, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, whether on his own motion or otherwise, at his discretion reduce or waive the penalty imposed or imposable under section 439 if he is satisfied that such person,— (a) before the Assessing Officer detected any concealment of particulars of income or of the inaccuracy of particulars furnished in respect of such income, has made a full and true disclosure of such particulars voluntarily and in good faith; and (b) has cooperated in any enquiry relating to the assessment of his income and has paid or made satisfactory arrangements to pay any tax or interest payable in consequence of an order passed under this Act in respect of the relevant tax year.

(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), a person shall be deemed to have made full and true disclosure of his income or of the particulars relating thereto if the difference between the assessed and returned income does not attract penalties under section 439.

(3) Irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (1) or (2), if in a case falling under section 439, the amount of income in respect of which the penalty is imposed or imposable for the relevant tax year or where such disclosure relates to more than one tax year, and aggregate amount of such income or disclosure thereof for such years exceeds ₹500,000, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall obtain prior approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General or Director General, as the case may be, before waiving or reducing the penalty by order referred to in sub-section (1).

(4) Where an order has been made under sub-section (1) in favour of any person, whether such order relates to one or more tax years, he shall not be entitled to any relief under this section in relation to any other tax year at any time after the making of such order.

(5) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, upon an application from the assessee, and after recording his reasons for doing so, reduce or waive the amount of penalty or penalties (whether they relate to one or more tax years) payable by the assessee or stay or compound any proceeding for the recovery of any such amount, if— (a) doing otherwise would cause genuine hardship to the assessee, having regard to the circumstances of the case; and (b) the assessee has cooperated in any inquiry relating to the assessment or any proceeding for the recovery of any amount due from him.

(6) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall take prior approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General or Director General, as the case may be, if the aggregate amount of penalties reduced or waived or compounded, as the case may be, under sub-section (5), exceeds ₹100,000.

(7) An order under sub-section (5), accepting or rejecting the application under the said sub-section, shall be passed within twelve months from the end of the month in which such application was received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.

(8) No rejection of application under sub-section (5) shall be made without giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard.

(9) Every order made under this section shall be final and shall not be called into question by any court or any other authority.

Introduction

Section 469 contains two routes to relief: discretionary reduction or waiver of section 439 penalty after voluntary good-faith disclosure and cooperation, and a separate hardship-based application under subsection (5). Each route has its own conditions and approval rules.

Key takeaways

1

Voluntary disclosure route

Subsection (1) requires full and true disclosure before detection, cooperation and payment or satisfactory arrangements.

2

Higher-income approval

For the subsection (1) route, prior senior approval is required when the income measure in subsection (3) exceeds ₹5,00,000.

3

Hardship route

Subsection (5) calls for genuine hardship, cooperation and recorded reasons.

4

Application decision

A subsection (5) application must be decided within twelve months from the end of its receipt month; rejection requires an opportunity to be heard.

What the section allows

Irrespective of anything else in the Act, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, on their own motion or on an application, reduce or waive a penalty imposed or imposable under Section 439, at their discretion, if satisfied that the person concerned meets prescribed conditions.

The general shape of the conditions

The conditions typically centre on the taxpayer having, before the Assessing Officer detected the concealment or under-reporting, voluntarily and in good faith disclosed the relevant particulars and cooperated in the related proceedings - similar in spirit to the waiver-and-immunity application process under Section 440, though this section is the standalone discretionary power the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner holds, whether or not a formal application under Section 440 has been made.

Voluntary disclosure and cooperation route

For sub-section (1), the disclosure must be full, true, voluntary and in good faith before the Assessing Officer detects concealment or inaccuracy. The person must also cooperate with assessment inquiries and pay, or make satisfactory arrangements to pay, the resulting tax and interest.

Genuine hardship route

Sub-section (5) separately permits reduction or waiver of penalty, or staying or compounding recovery proceedings, on an assessee’s application where otherwise there would be genuine hardship and the assessee has cooperated in assessment or recovery. Reasons must be recorded.

Approval, hearing and decision

Prior higher approval is required above the respective statutory thresholds in sub-sections (3) and (6). A sub-section (5) application is to be decided within twelve months from the end of the receipt month; rejection requires an opportunity of being heard.

Step-by-step flow for applying Section 469

  1. 1

    Which relief is sought?

    • Reduction or waiver of the Section 439 penalty on voluntary disclosure: Go to the next step.
    • Reduction, waiver, stay or compounding on genuine hardship: Skip to step 4.
  2. 2

    Before the Assessing Officer detected it, did the person make a full and true disclosure voluntarily and in good faith, cooperate in the enquiry, and pay or arrange to pay the tax and interest?

    These are the Section 469(1) conditions. Under Section 469(4), a person in whose favour an order under Section 469(1) has been made is not entitled to any relief under Section 469 for any other tax year.

    • No: The Section 469(1) relief is not available.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  3. 3

    Does the income involved exceed ₹5,00,000 (aggregated where several tax years are involved)?

    If so, Section 469(3) requires prior approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Director General or Director General.

    • Yes: The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may reduce or waive only after that approval.
    • No: The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may reduce or waive at his discretion.
  4. 4

    For the hardship route, has the assessee applied, would refusal cause genuine hardship, and has the assessee cooperated?

    These are the Section 469(5) conditions. Reasons must be recorded. If the aggregate reduced, waived or compounded exceeds ₹1,00,000, prior approval is needed (Section 469(6)).

  5. 5

    Order and finality

    The order on the application must be passed within twelve months from the end of the month in which it was received (Section 469(7)). It cannot be rejected without a hearing (Section 469(8)). Every order under Section 469 is final (Section 469(9)).

Practical checklist

Do

  • Identify whether the request relies on subsection (1) or subsection (5) and document its distinct conditions.
  • Keep proof of disclosure timing, cooperation, tax payment arrangements and any hardship evidence.

Avoid

  • Do not describe waiver as automatic merely because a disclosure or application was made.

Illustrative example

Worked example: a hardship application

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): An assessee owes penalties of an assumed ₹1,50,000 across two tax years. Its business has suffered a serious loss, and it has cooperated in the assessment and recovery proceedings. It applies to the Commissioner under Section 469(5) on 10 August 2027. The figures and dates are assumed.

  1. Conditions

    Hardship and cooperation are the two conditions in Section 469(5)(a) and (b). The Commissioner must record reasons for any relief.

  2. Approval

    Suppose the Commissioner proposes to waive the full ₹1,50,000. That exceeds ₹1,00,000, so prior approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner (or the Principal Director General or Director General) is needed under Section 469(6).

  3. Time limit

    The application was received in August 2027. The order must be passed within twelve months from the end of that month (31 August 2027), that is, by 31 August 2028.

  4. Hearing and finality

    If the Commissioner intends to reject the application, the assessee must first be heard (Section 469(8)). Under Section 469(9) the order is final.

Outcome

  • A waiver of ₹1,50,000 needs higher approval; a waiver of ₹1,00,000 or less would not.
  • The decision must come by 31 August 2028 on these dates.

Frequently asked questions

Who has the power to waive a penalty under Section 469?

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, acting on their own motion or on an application, and only at their discretion.

Which penalty can be reduced or waived under this section?

The penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income imposed or imposable under Section 439.

How is this different from Section 440?

Section 440 is the process for an assessee to formally apply for waiver and prosecution immunity together; Section 469 is the underlying discretionary power the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner holds to reduce or waive the penalty itself, which they can also exercise on their own motion.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Get help seeking penalty reduction or waiver

Last updated 9 October 2026