Press / to search

Chapter XVII - Special Provisions Relating to Certain Persons

Section 326

Section 326: consequence of not complying with Section 325

Section 326 sets out the computation consequences when a firm does not comply with Section 325 for a tax year: deduction of the specified partner payments is denied to the firm, and those payments are not chargeable to the partners under Section 26(2)(g).

On this page

Need advice on Section 326?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

Irrespective of anything contained in any other provision of this Act, where a firm does not comply with the provisions of section 325 for any tax year,—

(a) no deduction by way of any payment of interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration, by whatever name called, made by such firm to any partner of such firm shall be allowed in computing its income chargeable under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”; and

(b) such interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration shall not be chargeable to income-tax under section 26(2)(g) in the hands of partners of such firm.

Introduction

Where a firm fails to meet the specified requirement in section 325, section 326 changes how amounts paid to partners are treated in the firm’s and partners’ computations.

Key takeaways

1

Section 325 is the gateway

A firm that does not meet section 325’s conditions faces the computation consequence set out here.

2

Partner-payment deduction denied

The firm cannot deduct the specified interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration paid to partners when computing business or professional income.

The consequence

Irrespective of any other provision of the Act, where a firm does not comply with the provisions of section 325 for any tax year: no deduction is allowed, in computing its income chargeable under "Profits and gains of business or profession", for any payment of interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration (by whatever name called) made by the firm to a partner; and such interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration is not chargeable to income-tax under section 26(2)(g) in the hands of the firm's partners.

When this provision applies

Identify the particular Section 325 requirement and the tax year affected. That section includes the partnership instrument, individual shares, certified-copy and change requirements, as well as the separate consequence of a failure referred to in Section 271. Do not reduce the review to the existence of a signed deed alone.

Map every affected payment to a partner and classify it by substance. The listed interest, salary, bonus, commission and remuneration are covered regardless of the label used; a ledger description does not by itself remove a payment from the rule.

Limits and procedural safeguards

The matching partner-side rule is specifically that these payments are not chargeable under Section 26(2)(g). It should not be restated as a blanket exemption for every receipt or source of income of the partner.

Section 326 addresses the stated partner payments and their business-income deduction. It does not say that every unrelated operating expense of the firm is disallowed, nor that a similar add-back under some other provision automatically has the same partner-side consequence.

Step-by-step review

1. Record the precise Section 325 non-compliance and the relevant year.

2. Reconcile the affected partner payments against the accounts and individual partner ledgers.

3. Remove the prohibited deduction from the firm’s business-income computation.

4. Match the same amounts in the partners’ Section 26(2)(g) computations and preserve the basis for the treatment.

Hypothetical example

Hypothetical illustration: assume Section 326 applies and the firm has deducted ₹2 lakh interest and ₹3 lakh remuneration paid to partners. The ₹5 lakh deduction is disallowed in the firm’s business-income computation, and those same payments are not chargeable to the partners under Section 26(2)(g). The illustration does not exempt the partners’ unrelated income or determine the treatment of other firm expenses.

Records to prepare

The relevant deed and revised deed, certified-copy records and the identified compliance failure.

Partner-wise payment schedules reconciled with bank records and ledgers.

Matching firm and partner computation schedules identifying the same amounts.

Official amended Act source

Step-by-step flow for applying Section 326

  1. 1

    Is the person a firm, and which tax year is involved?

    Section 326 applies to a firm for a particular tax year. Identify the year being assessed.

  2. 2

    Has the firm complied with Section 325 for that tax year?

    Section 325 requires, among other things, that the partnership is evidenced by an instrument specifying the individual shares of the partners, and that a certified copy accompanies the return when assessment as a firm is first sought (or when there is a change).

    • Yes, it has complied: Section 326 does not apply. Partner payments are dealt with under the other provisions of the Act.
    • No: Go to the next step.
  3. 3

    List every payment by the firm to a partner

    Collect interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration paid to partners, whatever it is called. Other business expenses are not touched by Section 326.

  4. 4

    Disallow those payments in the firm's business income

    Under Section 326(a), no deduction is allowed for these payments in computing the firm's income under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession". This applies irrespective of anything in any other provision of the Act.

  5. 5

    Exclude the same payments from the partners' income under Section 26(2)(g)

    Under Section 326(b), these payments are not chargeable in the partners' hands under Section 26(2)(g), so the same amount is not taxed twice.

Practical checklist

Do

  • Identify the exact section 325 requirement that was not met.
  • Reconcile interest, salary, bonus, commission and remuneration paid to partners with the section 326 consequence.
  • The relevant deed and revised deed, certified-copy records and the identified compliance failure.
  • Partner-wise payment schedules reconciled with bank records and ledgers.
  • Matching firm and partner computation schedules identifying the same amounts.

Avoid

  • Apply the normal firm deduction and partner-income treatment without checking the non-compliance rule.

Illustrative example

Worked example: a firm whose deed does not specify shares

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): A two-partner trading firm files its return for a tax year. Its partnership deed does not state the individual profit shares of the partners, so the Section 325 condition is not met for that year. Before partner payments, its business profit is an assumed ₹20,00,000. During the year it paid partner salary of an assumed ₹6,00,000 and interest on partners' capital of an assumed ₹1,50,000.

  1. Check Section 325

    The deed does not specify the individual shares, so the firm has not complied with Section 325 for that tax year. Section 326 is triggered.

  2. Total the partner payments

    Salary ₹6,00,000 + interest ₹1,50,000 = ₹7,50,000 paid to partners.

  3. Firm's business income

    Under Section 326(a), the ₹7,50,000 is not deducted. The firm's business income stays at ₹20,00,000 instead of ₹20,00,000 − ₹7,50,000 = ₹12,50,000.

  4. Partners' income

    Under Section 326(b), the ₹7,50,000 is not charged in the partners' hands under Section 26(2)(g).

Outcome

  • The firm is taxed on ₹20,00,000 of business income; the partners are not taxed on the ₹7,50,000 under Section 26(2)(g).
  • The firm's other business expenses are allowed or disallowed under the normal rules; Section 326 deals only with payments to partners.

Glossary

Corresponding partner treatment
The specific Section 26(2)(g) treatment of the same payments for which Section 326 denies the firm’s deduction.
Payment classification
Identifying the substance of a partner payment rather than relying only on its accounting label.

Frequently asked questions

What happens to a firm's deduction for partner salary or interest if it fails Section 325's conditions?

The deduction is disallowed entirely under Section 326(a) - the firm cannot deduct interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration paid to partners.

If the firm loses the deduction, do the partners still get taxed on that income?

Section 326(b) says those same payments are not chargeable to the partners under Section 26(2)(g). This is a matching statutory consequence of the Section 326 trigger, not a blanket exemption for other income or for every deduction denied under another provision.

Does Section 326 disallow every business expense?

No. Its stated deduction denial concerns the listed payments by the firm to its partners. Other expenses require their own analysis.

Does any disallowance of partner expenditure automatically invoke this section?

No. Establish the Section 325 non-compliance that triggers Section 326 and distinguish a disallowance arising under a different provision.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Get help with partnership firm compliance

Last updated 10 October 2026