Press / to search

Chapter XVI - Procedure for Assessment

Section 299

Section 299: authority competent to make assessment of block period

Section 299 sets both the minimum officer rank for a block-period assessment order and a prior-approval requirement for searches or requisitions made on or after the Act's commencement.

On this page

Need advice on Section 299?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

(1) The order of assessment for the block period shall be passed by an Assessing Officer not below the rank of a Deputy Commissioner or an Assistant Commissioner or a Deputy Director or an Assistant Director.

(2) The order referred to in sub-section (1) shall be passed with the previous approval of the Additional Commissioner or the Additional Director or the Joint Commissioner or the Joint Director, in respect of search initiated or requisition made on or after the commencement of this Act.

Introduction

Section 299 specifies which authority may complete a block-period assessment and when a higher authority’s approval is required.

Key takeaways

1

Officer rank

The Assessing Officer passing the block assessment order must be at least a Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Deputy Director or Assistant Director.

2

Previous approval

For a search or requisition on or after commencement, prior approval must come from an Additional Commissioner, Additional Director, Joint Commissioner or Joint Director.

Who passes the order

Subsection (1) requires an Assessing Officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Deputy Director or Assistant Director.

Approval condition

Subsection (2) requires previous approval of the Additional Commissioner, Additional Director, Joint Commissioner or Joint Director for a search initiated or requisition made on or after commencement of the Act.

Scope and practical relevance

There are two distinct safeguards to check: the rank of the Assessing Officer passing the block-period assessment order, and the previous approval required by subsection (2). Satisfying one does not establish the other.

For subsection (2), identify when the search was initiated or the requisition was made. Its wording applies to searches or requisitions on or after commencement of this Act, and identifies the Additional Commissioner, Additional Director, Joint Commissioner or Joint Director as approving authorities.

Limits and separate requirements

A person who gathers information or participates in a search is not necessarily the Assessing Officer competent to pass the final block assessment. Match the role being exercised to the requirement in Section 299.

The section sets officer-rank and approval conditions, not the computation of undisclosed income or a deadline for completing assessment. Approval does not by itself establish that the assessed amount is correct.

Step-by-step assessment review

1. Identify the final block assessment order and the Assessing Officer who passed it.

2. Check the officer’s designation against the minimum rank condition in subsection (1).

3. Determine the search-initiation or requisition date relevant to subsection (2), and inspect the approval reference and chronology.

4. Compare the approving designation with the named authorities, while reviewing the assessment’s substantive and other procedural issues separately.

Hypothetical assessment example

Hypothetical illustration: an Assistant Commissioner passes a block-period assessment order concerning a search initiated after commencement. The rank check and previous-approval check are separate. The reviewer should establish the appropriate prior approval as well as the officer’s rank; an adequate rank alone does not answer the second question.

Documents and reconciliation checklist

The block assessment order and the signatory’s designation.

The search-initiation or requisition record establishing the relevant date.

The previous approval reference, approving authority and chronology.

Official amended Act source

Step-by-step flow for checking the authority under Section 299

  1. 1

    Is the order an assessment order for the block period?

    • No: Section 299 does not govern it.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  2. 2

    Is the Assessing Officer at least a Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Deputy Director or Assistant Director?

    This is the minimum rank fixed by Section 299(1).

    • No: The order is not passed by an officer of the rank Section 299(1) requires.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  3. 3

    Was the search initiated or requisition made on or after the commencement of the Act?

    Section 1(3) gives 1 April 2026 as the general commencement date.

    • Yes: Previous approval is required; go to the next step.
    • No: The approval condition in Section 299(2), as worded, does not apply; record the rank check and stop.
  4. 4

    Was the previous approval of an Additional Commissioner, Additional Director, Joint Commissioner or Joint Director obtained?

    The approval must come before the order is passed. Record the approving authority and the date of approval against the date of the order.

Practical checklist

Do

  • Verify the rank of the assessing authority and whether approval was obtained.
  • Keep the approval reference with the final block order.
  • The block assessment order and the signatory’s designation.
  • The search-initiation or requisition record establishing the relevant date.
  • The previous approval reference, approving authority and chronology.

Avoid

  • Assume an officer authorised for an ordinary assessment automatically meets every block-assessment approval condition.

Illustrative example

Worked example: checking the order file in a 2026 search

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): A search is initiated on a manufacturer on 5 June 2026. The block assessment order is signed by a Deputy Commissioner. The firm's adviser checks the order and its file note.

  1. Rank

    A Deputy Commissioner is one of the ranks named in Section 299(1), so the rank condition is met.

  2. Date of search

    5 June 2026 is after the general commencement date of 1 April 2026, so Section 299(2) applies.

  3. Approval

    The file note shows approval by a Joint Commissioner. The adviser compares its date with the date of the order to confirm it was given before the order.

  4. Scope of the check

    Section 299 deals only with who passes and approves the order. The computation of undisclosed income is tested under the other provisions of the Part.

Outcome

  • If the approval is dated before the order, both Section 299 conditions are satisfied.
  • If no prior approval is on record, the firm can raise the Section 299(2) point in its challenge to the order.

Glossary

Assessing authority
The Assessing Officer passing the block-period order subject to subsection (1).
Previous approval
The approval required before passing the order in the cases described by subsection (2).

Frequently asked questions

Can an officer below Assistant Commissioner or Assistant Director rank pass the block-period order?

No. Subsection (1) names those ranks and the Deputy Commissioner or Deputy Director as the minimum levels.

When is previous approval required under Section 299?

For the order described in subsection (1), in respect of a search initiated or requisition made on or after commencement of the Act.

Does the rank condition alone satisfy Section 299?

No. Check the separate previous-approval requirement where subsection (2) applies.

Does approval decide whether the undisclosed income computation is correct?

No. Approval and officer competence are distinct from the merits of the computation.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Talk to our team about a block assessment order

Last updated 10 October 2026