Press / to search

Chapter X - Special Provisions Relating to Avoidance of Tax

Section 176

Section 176: special measures for transactions with notified jurisdictional areas

Section 176 lets the Central Government notify a country or territory as a "notified jurisdictional area" where there is a lack of effective exchange of tax information, and then applies stricter deemed-associated-enterprise, documentation, disallowance and TDS rules to transactions with persons located there.

On this page

Need advice on Section 176?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026 and the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026 for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

(1) The Central Government may, by notification specify any country or territory outside India, as a notified jurisdictional area in relation to transactions entered into by any assessee, having regard to the lack of effective exchange of information with such jurisdiction.

(2) Irrespective of anything contrary in this Act, if an assessee enters into a transaction where one of the parties to the transaction is a person located in a notified jurisdictional area, then,— (a) all the parties to the transaction shall be deemed to be associated enterprises within the meaning of section 162; (b) any transaction of the nature described in sections 163(1) and (2) shall be deemed to be an international transaction within the meaning of section 163, and the provisions of sections 161, 162, 163, 165 (except the benefit of variation specified in sections 165(3)(a)(ii)), 166, 167, 171, 172 and 173 shall apply accordingly.

(3) Irrespective of anything to the contrary in this Act, no deduction shall be allowed— (a) for any payment made to any financial institution located in a notified jurisdictional area, unless the assessee furnishes an authorisation in the prescribed form authorising the Board or any other income-tax authority acting on its behalf to seek relevant information from the said financial institution on behalf of such assessee; and (b) for any other expenditure or allowance (including depreciation) arising from the transaction with a person located in a notified jurisdictional area, unless the assessee maintains such other documents and furnishes such information as may be prescribed, in this behalf.

(4) Irrespective of anything to the contrary in this Act, if, in any tax year, the assessee has received or credited any sum from any person located in a notified jurisdictional area and— (a) the assessee does not provide any explanation about the source of the said sum in the hands of such person or in the hands of the beneficial owner (if such person is not the beneficial owner of the said sum); or (b) the explanation provided by the assessee, in the opinion of the Assessing Officer, is not satisfactory, then such sum shall be deemed to be the income of the assessee for that tax year.

(5) Irrespective of anything to the contrary in this Act, if any person located in a notified jurisdictional area is entitled to receive any sum or income or amount on which tax is deductible under Chapter XIX-B, the tax shall be deducted at the highest of the following rates–– (a) at the rate or rates in force; (b) at the rate specified in the relevant provisions of this Act; (c) at the rate of 30%.

(6) For the purposes of this section,— (a) “person located in a notified jurisdictional area” shall include,— (i) a person who is resident of the notified jurisdictional area; (ii) a person, not being an individual, which is established in the notified jurisdictional area; or (iii) a permanent establishment of a person not falling in sub-clause (i) or (ii), in the notified jurisdictional area; (b) “permanent establishment” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 173(c); (c) “transaction” shall have meaning assigned to it in section 173(e).

Introduction

Transactions with a person in a notified jurisdictional area can trigger special transfer-pricing treatment, evidence duties, deemed income and a higher withholding-rate rule. The jurisdiction must actually be notified, and each consequence has its own conditions.

Key takeaways

1

Notified jurisdiction

The Central Government may notify a foreign country or territory for these special measures where effective tax-information exchange is lacking.

2

Enhanced compliance

Transactions with persons there face documentary conditions for deductions, source-of-funds scrutiny and withholding at the highest of the specified rates, including 30%.

Notifying a jurisdictional area

The Central Government may, by notification, specify any country or territory outside India as a notified jurisdictional area for transactions with any assessee, having regard to the lack of effective exchange of information with that jurisdiction.

Deemed associated enterprise and international transaction

Where an assessee enters into a transaction in which one party is located in a notified jurisdictional area, irrespective of anything else in the Act:

  • all parties to the transaction are deemed to be associated enterprises within the meaning of Section 162;
  • any transaction of the nature described in Section 163(1) and (2) is deemed to be an international transaction within the meaning of Section 163, and the transfer pricing provisions of Sections 161, 162, 163, 165 (except the benefit of variation under Section 165(3)(a)(ii)), 166, 167, 171, 172 and 173 apply accordingly.

Disallowance of deductions

No deduction is allowed for a payment to a financial institution located in a notified jurisdictional area, unless the assessee furnishes a prescribed-form authorisation letting the Board (or an income-tax authority on its behalf) seek relevant information from that financial institution.

No deduction is allowed for any other expenditure or allowance (including depreciation) arising from a transaction with a person located in a notified jurisdictional area, unless the assessee maintains the prescribed documents and furnishes the prescribed information.

Unexplained sums received from a notified jurisdictional area

If, in a tax year, the assessee has received or credited any sum from a person located in a notified jurisdictional area, and either does not explain the source of that sum in the hands of that person (or the beneficial owner, if different), or the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with the explanation given, the sum is deemed to be the assessee's income for that year.

Higher TDS rate

Where a person located in a notified jurisdictional area is entitled to receive any sum, income or amount on which tax is deductible under Chapter XIX-B, tax must be deducted at the highest of: the rate or rates in force; the rate specified in the relevant provisions of the Act; or 30%.

Key definitions

"Person located in a notified jurisdictional area" includes a resident of that area, a non-individual person established there, and a permanent establishment there of any other person. "Permanent establishment" has the meaning assigned in Section 173(c), and "transaction" has the meaning assigned in Section 173(e).

Step-by-step flow for applying Section 176

  1. 1

    Is a party to the transaction located in a notified jurisdictional area?

    A resident of the area, a non-individual established there, or a permanent establishment there, in an area notified by the Central Government.

    • No: Section 176 does not apply.
    • Yes: Go to the next step.
  2. 2

    Apply transfer pricing

    All parties are deemed associated enterprises, and the transaction is deemed an international transaction. Sections 161, 162, 163, 165, 166, 167, 171, 172 and 173 apply, but without the benefit of the Section 165(3)(a)(ii) variation band.

  3. 3

    Is a deduction claimed for a payment or expenditure?

    • Payment to a financial institution there: Allowed only if the prescribed authorisation is furnished to let the Board seek information from that institution.
    • Other expenditure or allowance, including depreciation: Allowed only if the prescribed documents are kept and the prescribed information is furnished.
  4. 4

    Was any sum received from or credited by such a person?

    • Source not explained, or explanation not satisfactory: The sum is deemed income for that tax year.
  5. 5

    Is tax deductible under Chapter XIX-B on a sum payable to such a person?

    • Yes: Deduct tax at the highest of: the rates in force, the rate specified in the Act, or 30%.

Practical checklist

Do

  • Verify notification and counterparty location before invoking the special measures.
  • Maintain source-of-funds, payment and prescribed transaction documents, and compare all three withholding-rate alternatives.

Avoid

  • Do not treat every low-tax jurisdiction as notified automatically.
  • Do not overlook the beneficial owner's source explanation for a receipt from a notified-area person.

Illustrative example

Worked example: a payment to a person in a notified area

Hypothetical facts (illustration only, not a real taxpayer): An Indian company pays ₹10,00,000 for services to a firm established in a territory notified under Section 176(1). For illustration, assume the rate of tax deduction that would otherwise apply is 10%. During the same year, it also receives a ₹25,00,000 advance from another entity in that territory and cannot explain where the funds came from.

  1. Transfer pricing

    The firm is deemed an associated enterprise and the service payment an international transaction. The arm's length price is determined without the variation band in Section 165(3)(a)(ii).

  2. Tax deduction

    The highest of the assumed 10% and 30% is 30%, so tax of 30% of ₹10,00,000 = ₹3,00,000 is deducted.

  3. Deduction for the expense

    The ₹10,00,000 is deductible only if the company keeps the prescribed documents and furnishes the prescribed information.

  4. Unexplained receipt

    If the company cannot satisfactorily explain the source of the ₹25,00,000, that sum is deemed its income for the year.

Outcome

  • Check the current notification before dealing with any foreign counterparty; the Act does not list the notified areas itself.
  • Keep source-of-funds evidence for every receipt from such areas.

Glossary

Notified jurisdictional area
A foreign country or territory specified by Central Government notification for inadequate information exchange.
Beneficial owner
The person whose underlying ownership of a sum can matter to the source-explanation test.

Frequently asked questions

Who decides which countries are notified jurisdictional areas?

The Central Government, by notification, having regard to the lack of effective exchange of information with that country or territory.

What TDS rate applies to payments to persons in a notified jurisdictional area?

The highest of the rate or rates in force, the rate specified in the relevant provision of the Act, or 30%.

Can a taxpayer still claim deductions for payments to a financial institution in a notified jurisdictional area?

Only if the assessee furnishes a prescribed-form authorisation allowing the Board (or an authority acting for it) to seek relevant information from that financial institution directly.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Check TDS obligations on notified-jurisdiction payments

Last updated 10 October 2026